Automotive Testing Best Practices: SIL, HIL, and Why a Single Approach Falls Short by Jon M Quigley As someone deeply engaged in automotive product development and testing, I believe that robust strategies using both software-in-the-loop (SIL) and hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) are essential. Drawing on the insights and frameworks of Jon M. Quigley, I want to explore […]

The Need for Transparency in Testing In the high-stakes world of automotive product development, demands to deliver vehicles on schedule often collide with the critical necessity for transparency in testing results. When timelines tighten and executive pressure mounts, the temptation to “fast-track” projects at the expense of rigorous verification grows. Yet, ensuring transparency in testing […]

Written with Perplexity – also found at https://www.perplexity.ai/search/write-a-responser-to-the-post-aOnmPGV4SoeB_AawG1JTJQ#0 The post from Robert Fey: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/robert-fey-78178b154_automotivetesting-requirementsengineering-activity-7330094926694662144-Wsy4/ My Thoughts – From Me In general, we should not think of product verification and validation efforts dogmatically. We are well advised to think in terms of principles. Everything is context-dependent, the degree of diligence commensurate with the associated risk.  We […]

Understanding Metrics Masking Failure in Automotive Projects In the automotive industry, project metrics are essential for tracking progress, ensuring safety, and delivering quality products. However, as Jon M. Quigley emphasizes, metrics alone do not guarantee project success, especially when they confirm what stakeholders already want to believe rather than reveal the actual state of a […]

It’s a Great Day LinkedIn connections have asked me for my perspective on test and verification (ATEF vs Jon M. Quigley testing principles). I like what I do. I have spent years (decades, actually) studying and applying product development approaches. This includes time as a development engineer, test engineer, and the manager of a test […]

By Jon M. Quigley I saw a LinkedIn post yesterday about the scope of testing during times of compressed schedule. The position was to test what is new in the software, and of that new, what is the most important, perhaps meaning what if it goes wrong, would be the worst for the client or […]