How to Spot Metrics Masking Failure in Automotive Project Management

Understanding Metrics Masking Failure in Automotive Projects

In the automotive industry, project metrics are essential for tracking progress, ensuring safety, and delivering quality products. However, as Jon M. Quigley emphasizes, metrics alone do not guarantee project success, especially when they confirm what stakeholders already want to believe rather than reveal the actual state of a project.

If you want to know more about these cognitive biases, we welcome the opportunity to present key biases impacting project management, specifically product testing and verification. We also wrote a book that includes some of this with my brother.

Why Metrics Masking Failure Happens

Metrics masking failure occurs when the data is manipulated, selectively reported, overly distilled, or misinterpreted to present a more favorable outcome than reality supports. Decades of experience in automotive testing and project management warn that “trust but verify” is only effective if we employ a variety of verification methodologies. A multipronged testing approach and transparency can help illuminate the true nature of the situation.

Approach to Exposing Hidden Risks

Here’s how to prevent metrics masking failure in your automotive projects:

Align Metrics with Objectives: Stress the importance of ensuring that project and product metrics are directly tied to the objectives and performance indicators that matter most for safety, quality, and customer satisfaction.
Engage the Team: Involve engineers, testers, and stakeholders in defining what to measure and how to interpret results. This reduces the risk of “traceability theatre” and ensures everyone understands the real meaning behind the numbers.
Continuous Verification: Manage by walking around—asking questions, observing processes, and comparing reported metrics with actual conditions on the ground.
Adapt and Respond: As new data emerges, adapt your measurement approach and respond quickly to any signs that the numbers are not reflecting reality.

Signs Your Metrics Are Masking Failure

Being a contrarian and taking everything you see with a bit of scepticism is beneficial. Based on experience, the first signals of metrics masking failure include:

There is a lack of alignment between reported metrics and actual outcomes- a clue that we are measuring incorrectly.
Metric results that fly in the face of experiences.
Long periods between measuring and generating metrics.
Over-reliance on lagging indicators, not leading.
Repeatedly meeting all metrics targets while stakeholders or customers report ongoing issues.
Over-reliance on lagging indicators (such as defect counts after delivery) rather than leading indicators (like process adherence or early test results).
Resistance to independent verification or external audits.

Building a Culture That Values Real Metrics

The solution to metrics masking failure is not more data, but better data—and a culture that values honesty over comfort. By empowering teams to own their metrics and fostering open communication, organizations can ensure that their measurement systems drive real improvement, not just compliance.